Archive
Tipo contenuto: Exhibition Review
Exhibition Review
Criticism
Open Access
Abstractive Reuse. A Review of SHIFT: Ecologies at the 2025 Chicago Architecture Biennial
by Alex Serbanescu
pp. 241–248
Exhibition Review
Urbanism
Open Access
Urbs and Orbis: A Display of Actual Rome. An Exhibition at the MAXXI
by Caterina Padoa Schioppa
pp. 249–260
Exhibition Review
Criticism
Open Access
Beyond Exhibiting. Discourse at the 2025 Venice Architecture Biennale
by Maurizio Sabini
pp. 199–204
Exhibition Review
Criticism
Open Access
Stories of Women Architects Who Made Their Mark
by Caterina Padoa Schioppa
pp. 219–230
Exhibition Review
Criticism
Open Access
Carlo Aymonino: The Critical Curiosity of a Visionary Architect
by Maurizio Sabini
pp. 285–293
Exhibition Review
Criticism
Open Access
“FREESPACE” and the Citizen: Stories of Generosity from the Venice Architecture Biennale 2018
by Carla Brisotto, Cristina Cassandra Murphy, Martha Battaglin Ramos
pp. 237–252
Exhibition Review
Criticism
Open Access
Little Boxes and Big Boxes. On Donald Judd’s “Obdurate Space”
by Kyle May, Julia van den Hout
pp. 233–240
Exhibition Review
Criticism
Open Access
Make New Critical Stories. A View on the 2017 Chicago Architecture Biennial
by Maurizio Sabini
pp. 219–231
The 2017 edition of the Chicago Architecture Biennial, Make New History, like any other similar event, has caused debate and controversy. Beyond inevitable flaws and shortcomings, the CAB though deserves to be appreciated for the quality of most of the exhibited projects, works or installations, some of which managed also to offer what was missing in this CAB’s main theme: a critical perspective. The theme itself of the CAB is challenged, but the good works of many international architects and artists, well selected by the Artistic Directors Sharon Johnston and Mark Lee, is appreciated for their contributions to a critical discourse in our field, for their “critical stories.” Through a discussion of the curators’ hypothesis and of some of the most interesting works, as well as of some critical contributions included in the exhibition catalog, this review tries to offer a critical assessment for an event that, fortunately, has already acquired an outstanding position within the architecture cultural landscape of our time.